This latest version does make great strides in speed as long as you have a fast machine with at least 12GB of RAM and multi-processor CPU. I feel Adobe is playing catch-up to their competition and still behind. There really is no good equivalent in Lightroom. I add selective contrast for a sense of depth to almost every image and this is not feasible to do in Lightroom- typically I do this with Dynamic Contrast in ON1 Photo Raw or Precision Contrast in Topaz Studio. I shoot a lot of work on my Fuji system and Lightroom still has problems with “worm” effects and diminished acutance (aka “sharpness”) on some subjects with Fuji raw files. There are two main reasons I don’t use Lightroom as my mainstay processor anymore: 1. If I didn’t have ON1 Photo Raw as an option I might still be using Lightroom for my main hub as I was before, relying on other programs and plug-ins to make up where Lightroom is lacking. Lightroom Classic CC on paper (see my chart) should be the best choice for an all-rounder but the numbers aren’t the whole story. Some of these migrated from plug-ins and some are new.
#Iridient developer fuji free
There are two main reasons the Topaz following is so dedicated: No one else has free lifetime upgrades and no else has the likes of Impression, Glow, Abstraction, AI ReMix, Precision Contrast, and ReStyle. There aren’t any image management capabilities so other than the aforementioned capabilities, it’s a single image processor. You can have multiple images open and create versions, all of which appear on a filmstrip at the bottom. The base Studio program is free along with some basic adjustments and extensive masking capabilities. This company has their roots in creativity and consequently they have come up with Adjustments and plug-ins that no one else has. Until their release of Studio, they had been creating plug-ins. Topaz Studio is unique with a dedicated following and Topaz products are an old favorite of mine. I consider these a minor inconvenience and would not want to be without my favorite filters in this gem of a processor ( Golden Hour, Sunrays, Orton Effect, Bi-Color Toning, and AI-Accent) Best Artistic Effects Lack of lens profiles is definitely the bigger factor and really more applicable for mirrorless users like me, where we’re used to seeing corrected images in our viewfinders and want that to be reflected when processing. It takes 21 seconds to open an X-Trans file. No lens profiles built in (supposed to be coming in the future according to Skylum) 2. It does handle raw files well, including Fuji X-Trans but there are two reasons I don’t use it for initial raw processing with my Fuji raw files: 1. I typically hop into Luminar after I’ve exported a high-resolution file from ON1. Fun and enjoyment rank highly in my book. Luminar 2018 is a fabulous single image processor (image management coming down the road.) It has the most intuitive and easy to use interface out there.
#Iridient developer fuji update
I’ve been working with a pre-release and will report on the update when it’s released. ON1 will be releasing a significant update in a few days. You can work around it by filtering to see just raw or just jpeg but it can be a problem if you already have final versions in other formats that you want to see alongside raw without seeing hundreds of jpegs. I would really like to see ON1 provide the ability to combine RAW+JPEG. It does a great job with Fuji X-Trans files. If you deal with lots of images and want to manage them (culling, rating, keywords, searches, etc.) and have a broad array of useful tools for processing along with fabulous masking capabilities, then ON1 Photo Raw is it. ON1 Photo Raw 2018 is the closest to being a comprehensive solution. I realize that may not work for everyone so here’s my bottom line on these: Best All-Around Solution I may be the exception but I actually use all four of these. I encourage you to read the rest of the review, check out the Pros and Cons below and look at the chart I made to help you match one or more of these processors to your own personal needs and workflow. The reality is we all have different needs, goals and personal workflows.
I would love to be able to tell you there is one winner that will solve all your needs. And the opposite will lead to frustration and spending too much time trying to reach your imaging goals. An intuitive interface with images that open up with proper color and a workflow from start to finish that is fast and efficient will all lead to a more enjoyable experience. Let’s face it, if you don’t enjoy working on your images then you may have to question your dedication to photography.
0 kommentar(er)
